Library

Abstract

THIS ARTICLE SETS A THEORETICAL FOUNDATION TO TRANSFORMATIVE MIXED METHODS RESEARCH THAT IS ROOTED IN THE CRITICAL THEORY OF HABERMAS AND HONNETH. THIS ADDRESSES HABERMAS’S KNOWLEDGE-CONSTITUTIVE INTERESTS AND COMMUNICATIVE ACTION FOR REDRESSING SOCIETAL PATHOLOGIES, AND HONNETH’S WORK ON (MIS)RECOGNITION, (DIS)RESPECT, AND SOCIAL JUSTICE. IN DOING SO, THE ARTICLE ARGUES FOR BROADENING THE SCOPE AND EMBRACE OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, TO GO BEYOND BEING EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ONLY OR LARGELY, AND TO INCLUDE THEORISATION, CRITICAL THEORETICAL DISCOURSE AND ITS ANALYSIS, AND IDEOLOGY CRITIQUE, AS LEGITIMATE METHODS FOR (TRANSFORMATIVE) MIXED METHODS RESEARCH. THE ARTICLE MAKES A CASE FOR THESE METHODS AS CONSTITUTING IMPORTANT RESEARCH METHODS IN THEMSELVES IN THE PORTFOLIO OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, MOVING THE BOUNDARIES OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH BEYOND SOLELY EMPIRICAL STUDIES, AND PROVIDING EMANCIPATORY LENSES AND CONSCIOUSNESS-RAISING IN RECOGNISING THAT TRANSFORMATION TAKES MANY FORMS.